Breast Cancer Reconstruction

Primary and revision breast reconstruction individualized to your diagnosis, your oncologic treatment plan, your anatomy, and your vision of what comes next.

A breast cancer diagnosis changes everything, and the path through it is different for every woman. For many, the decision to pursue breast reconstruction is part of reclaiming a sense of wholeness after mastectomy or lumpectomy. It is not a decision that needs to be rushed, and it is not a decision that needs to be made at all. But for those who do choose reconstruction, the quality, timing, and type of that reconstruction matters profoundly for the long-term physical result, for quality of life, and for the ability to move forward.

Dr. June Yoo brings deep expertise in both implant-based and hybrid-autologous breast reconstruction to every patient she cares for. Her role is not to recommend a single approach, it is to ensure that you understand all of your options, that your reconstruction is planned in close coordination with your oncologic team, and that the final result reflects the outcome you envisioned.

Breast reconstruction is not a luxury. Under federal law, it is a covered benefit — and understanding your rights is one of the first things Dr. Yoo's team will help you with.

Your Rights Under Federal Law

The Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA) of 1998 is federal legislation that requires most group health insurance plans covering mastectomy to also cover all stages of breast reconstruction — including:

  • Reconstruction of the breast on which mastectomy was performed

  • Surgery and reconstruction of the opposite breast to produce a symmetrical appearance

  • Prostheses and treatment of physical complications at all stages, including lymphedema

  • Revisions to the reconstructed breast, regardless of when they occur relative to the original surgery

Critically, coverage cannot be denied based on how much time has passed since the mastectomy, and reconstruction can be pursued at any point: immediately at the time of mastectomy or years later. Coverage also extends to patients who had their mastectomy under a different insurance plan, and is not limited to patients with a cancer diagnosis. Patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy for high-risk gene mutations (including BRCA1 and BRCA2) also have reconstruction rights under the WHCRA.

Dr. Yoo's office will work directly with your insurance to verify your reconstruction benefits and navigate the prior authorization process before your surgery.

One of the first decisions in reconstruction planning is timing, and there is no universally correct answer. The right timing depends on your oncologic treatment plan, your risk factors, and your personal preferences.

Immediate reconstruction is performed at the same time as mastectomy, in a coordinated surgery with your breast surgical oncologist. It has the advantages of avoiding a second anesthetic exposure and surgical episode, preserving the natural skin envelope of the breast, and allowing reconstruction to begin before the psychological impact of post-mastectomy appearance takes hold. Most patients who are appropriate candidates for immediate reconstruction.

Delayed reconstruction is performed as a separate surgery, weeks, months, or even years after mastectomy. It may be the preferred approach when the oncologic plan includes radiation. Delayed reconstruction is also appropriate for patients who need time to complete chemotherapy, recover from initial surgery, or simply feel ready to pursue reconstruction on their own timeline.

Delayed-immediate reconstruction is a staged approach in which a tissue expander is placed at the time of mastectomy to preserve the skin envelope, and definitive reconstruction is performed after oncologic treatment is complete. This approach is commonly used when the need for radiation is uncertain at the time of mastectomy.

The decision between immediate and delayed reconstruction is made collaboratively between Dr. Yoo, your breast surgical oncologist, and your medical and radiation oncologists based on your complete oncologic picture.

Reconstruction by Anatomic Immediate vs. Delayed Reconstruction

Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive approach in the United States, accounting for the majority of post-mastectomy reconstructions performed annually. It involves restoring breast volume using a silicone or saline implant, either in one or two surgical stages.

Two-Stage Reconstruction: Tissue Expander Followed by Implant Exchange

The most common implant-based approach involves placing a tissue expander at the time of mastectomy as the first stage, followed by gradual expansion over several weeks to months, and then a second surgery to exchange the expander for a permanent implant.

This approach allows the skin and soft tissue to be gradually stretched to accommodate the desired volume, and provides the flexibility to complete expansion before deciding on final implant size. It also allows for adjustment of the reconstructive plan if post-mastectomy radiation is ultimately required.

Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction

In carefully selected patients, particularly those with excellent mastectomy skin flap perfusion, adequate skin envelope, and no anticipated need for radiation, a permanent implant can be placed at the time of mastectomy in a single surgical stage, eliminating the need for a second procedure. Patient selection is critical, as direct-to-implant reconstruction is less forgiving of skin flap compromise than the two-stage approach.

Prepectoral vs. Subpectoral Implant Placement

One of the most significant technical decisions in implant-based reconstruction is the plane of implant placement:

Subpectoral (under the muscle) placement has been the traditional approach for decades, providing additional soft tissue coverage over the implant. It does, however, require elevation of the pectoralis major muscle, which is associated with postoperative pain, animation deformity (visible implant movement with muscle contraction), and potential shoulder girdle morbidity.

Prepectoral (above the muscle) placement, supported by acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or synthetic mesh, places the implant entirely in front of the pectoralis — preserving the muscle completely. Published comparative data demonstrate that prepectoral reconstruction is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shorter time to complete expansion, and less animation deformity compared to subpectoral placement, with comparable complication rates in appropriately selected patients.

Prepectoral placement requires sufficient mastectomy skin flap thickness and perfusion. It may not be appropriate for all patients, and the final decision is made after careful intraoperative assessment.

Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy and Implant Reconstruction

Radiation significantly increases the complication rate of implant-based breast reconstruction. This includes capsular contracture, wound healing problems, implant exposure, and reconstruction failure. When post-mastectomy radiation therapy is anticipated or required, the timing and sequencing of reconstruction require careful planning. Options include performing radiation during the expander phase and exchanging to the permanent implant after completion, or considering a switch to autologous reconstruction after radiation is complete.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Autologous reconstruction uses the patient's own tissue to reconstruct the breast. It produces a breast that is composed entirely of living tissue, feels natural, ages naturally with the body, and is not subject to the complications of a foreign implant.

The primary trade-off is complexity as autologous reconstruction involves a longer surgery, a longer recovery, and a donor site scar in addition to the breast scar. It is not appropriate for every patient. The decision between autologous and implant-based reconstruction requires a candid discussion of your anatomy, your oncologic plan, your lifestyle, your donor site preferences, and your goals for the reconstructed breast.

DIEP Flap (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap)

The DIEP flap is the most widely performed perforator-based autologous breast reconstruction technique and is considered among the preferred approaches for abdominal flap reconstruction. The DIEP flap harvests skin and fat from the lower abdomen which is transferred to the chest as a free flap, with its blood supply reconnected microsurgically to vessels in the chest using microsurgical anastomosis.

Latissimus Dorsi Flap

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap uses skin, fat and muscle from the upper back, rotated through the axilla and onto the chest, usually over an implant. The volume from the back in addition to a small implant underneath can really not only look like a breast, but feel warm in temperature and soft like a natural breast. This is Dr Yoo’s preferred technique for autologous breast reconstruction.

Revision Breast Reconstruction

Breast reconstruction is rarely a single event. Most patients benefit from one or more revisional procedures to refine the reconstructed breast, address asymmetry, or improve the overall aesthetic result. Revisions are a standard and expected part of the reconstruction journey, and under the WHCRA, they are covered by insurance.

Am I a Good Candidate?

You may be a candidate for breast reconstruction if you:

  • Are planning or have undergone mastectomy (therapeutic or prophylactic) or lumpectomy

  • Have completed, or have a clear plan for, oncologic treatment

  • Are in good overall health appropriate for the planned surgical approach

  • Have realistic expectations for a staged reconstructive process with multiple steps

  • Wish to restore a sense of physical wholeness and symmetry after breast cancer treatment

There is no expiration on reconstruction. Women who had mastectomies years or even decades ago and never pursued reconstruction — or who had a prior reconstruction they wish to revise — are candidates for consultation at any time.

Your consultation with Dr. Yoo

Your breast reconstruction consultation is among the most meaningful conversations Dr. Yoo has with any patient. She will review your complete surgical and oncologic history, evaluate your anatomy and donor site options, discuss your goals and your oncologic treatment timeline, and present the full range of options available to you.

Key decisions you will make together include:

  1. Timing — immediate, delayed-immediate, or delayed reconstruction

  2. Reconstructive approach — implant-based, autologous, or combination

  3. Implant placement plane if implant-based — prepectoral vs. subpectoral

  4. Radiation sequencing — how your oncologic treatment plan affects the reconstructive approach

  5. Staged plan — how many procedures are anticipated, in what order, and on what timeline

  6. Symmetry procedure on the opposite breast — whether and when

Frequently Asked Questions

Rebuilding. Restoring. Feeling more like yourself, on your terms.

Breast reconstruction is among the most meaningful work Dr. June Yoo performs as a surgeon. She understands that the decision to pursue reconstruction and choice of reconstruction is deeply personal, shaped by your relationship with your body, your cancer experience, and your vision of what wholeness means to you. Whatever that vision is, she is here to help you achieve it.

We invite you to schedule a consultation at our Newport Beach office. Your reconstructive journey begins with a conversation — and Dr Yoo will be there to guide you every step of the way.